Saturday, July 29, 2006

Munich (2005)

This is how depressed you'll be
Director: Steven Spielberg
Venue: DVD
DVD Features: audio, subtitles, intro by Spielberg

The movie Munich was inspired by the terrorist abduction and massacre of 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympics. It features actual television news coverage from the event. However, instead of focusing on the attack itself, the movie revolves around the subsequent activities of a team of agents assigned to hunt down the men responsible. It centers on the man chosen to lead these clandestine activities and the psychological effects the mission has on him.

Munich is heavily charged with political commentary that is as relevant now as it was in 1972. I imagine that is why Spielberg chose to release this movie when he did. I also think this director likes to make movies from time to time that remind the film making community that he’s still very Jewish. Not being much of a history buff, and not having been around in 1972, I wasn’t previously aware of the Olympic tragedy in Munich. My lack of knowledge, however, didn’t detract from my enjoyment of the film. The opening scenes give enough background of the event to prepare the audience for the rest of the movie and does so quickly and actively enough to hold its interest. The movie’s basis on true events also serves to generate more of a desire to focus on what’s happening between the various players involved.

Plot: 4 stars

I really enjoyed the way Munich showed how effected these men were by everything going on around them. I found the acting in the movie convincing. The decline of the main character’s state of mind is consistent and apparent. It seems believable for a man in his situation. The men on his team are made up of the usual assortment of specialists, like an episode of Mission Impossible or The A-Team. There is the explosives specialist, the testosterone junky, and the clean-up expert. In this regard, Munich lost points for originality.

Acting: 3 stars

As should be expected of any espionage drama, there are plenty of action sequences. Although there isn’t much in the way of hand-to-hand combat, the movie is loaded with explosions and gunplay. Munich fills the in-between moments with tension and suspense. All of these ingredients are well paced and there aren’t any dull or boring scenes.

Action: 4 stars

The only category in which this Spielberg feature seriously lacks, is atmosphere. Although a large majority of the story takes place on foreign soil, there isn’t much of an international feel. Whether it was a sunny day in Italy, a rainy night in Brussels, or an industrial compound in Lebanon, I still felt like I hadn’t left the Hollywood lot. It takes more than a backdrop of the Eiffel Tower to make Paris come alive. Likewise, it takes more than a few colorful explosions to impress me.

Visual: 2 stars

Avner (Eric Bana) and his team are charged with the task of assassinating the 11 Palesinian men behind the athlete’s deaths. All of them are Jewish and, consequently, Munich is peppered with dialogue illustrating the characters’ convictions and beliefs. There are several points in the film, during which, the men involved question whether or not what they’re doing is right or justified. However, even the conversations that required subtitles didn’t do much to convince me of the regional differences.

Dialogue: 3 ½ stars

In summary, Munich was a satisfying cinematic experience. I neglected to view any of the DVD’s special features, but I do know that an intro by the director is available as an option to preceed the film. If you are into international espionage, Munich is solid, but don’t expect any James Bond type romance. Rent this movie only if you’ve got 2 hours and 44 minutes of uninterrupted viewing time (it sounds longer than it feels). This is definitely a movie that you’ll regret not giving your full attention to.

Alternate viewing choice: Syriana
IMDB site
Official site
Rotten Tomatoes review

***Note: If you found this review via IMDB, please let us know by leaving a comment. Thanks!***

Thursday, July 27, 2006

The F List

Fay Grim

Fido

Final Destination 3

The Fountain

Excuse the Mess

I'm in the process of doing some maintainence. So, the next 26 posts or so will look like a retarded episode of Seseme Street. If you'd like to view the latest review, please use the links to the right.

The Z List

There aren't currently any reviews in this section.
In the meantime, here are some words that start with the letter "Z":

Zero
Zebu
zeroth
zoogenic
zither

The Y List

You Better Watch Out

The X List

There aren't currenly any movies in this section.
In the meantime, here are some words that begin with the letter "X":

Xanadu
xenia
xerus
xyloid
xiphoid

The W List

Wanted

The Weather Man

The V List

Van Helsing

The U List

Unbreakable

UnDead

The S List

A Scanner Darkly

A Sound of Thunder

Seabiscuit

Shutter

Silent Hill

Sleepy Hollow

A Soul Haunted By Painting

Spiderman 3

Stranger Than Fiction

The Strangers

Superman Returns

The T List

Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning

Turistas

The R List

Rawhead Rex

The Ring Two

Runaway Jury

Running Scared

The Q List

There are currently no reviews of movies that begin with the letter Q. In the meantime, here is a list of interesting words that begin with Q:

quadragesimal
quadrillion
quadroon
quahog
quant

The O List

Only You

The P List

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

Premonition

The Prestige

The N List

Neko No Ongaeshi (a.k.a. The Cat Returns)

The New World

Night Watch (a.k.a. Nochnoy Dozor)

No Country for Old Men

Notorious

The Notorious Bettie Page

The M List

M

The Mangler 2

Marie Antoinette

Master & Commander: The Far Side of the World

The Matador

The Messengers

The Mothman Prophecies

Munich

The L List

Lady In The Water

Land of the Dead

Little Miss Sunshine

Lord of War

Lucky Number Slevin

The K List

There aren't currently any movies in this section.
In the meantime, here are some words that begin with the letter "K":

kapok
kerplunk
knop
kymograph
koala

The J List

The Jacket

Juno

The I List

I Am Legend

The Ice Harvest

I'll Sleep When I'm Dead

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Into the Blue

Iron Man

The H List

Hancock

Hard Candy

Harry Potter and The Order of The Phoenix

Harry Potter and The Sorcerer's Stone

The Haunting


Hua Hun
(a.k.a. A Soul Haunted by Painting)

The G List

Great Expectations

The Grudge

The E List

Evolution

The C List

Casino Royale

The Cat Returns (a.k.a Neko No Ongaeshi)

Christmas Evil

Collateral

Constantine

The Count of Monte Cristo

Crank

Creep

The D List

The Da Vinci Code

The Dark Knight

Dark Remains

The Darjeeling Limited

Derailed

The Devil's Backbone

The Descent

Domino

The B List

Babel

Beerfest

Best In Show

Big Fish

Borat

Boy Eats Girl

Brainscan

Brokeback Mountain

Burn After Reading

The Butterfly Effect

The A List

A Scanner Darkly

A Soul Haunted by Painting a.k.a Hua Hun

A Sound of Thunder

Almost Famous

Atonement

Lady In the Water (2006)

Anyone have a towel?

Director: M. Knight Shyamalan
Venue: theater
Trailer

Let me preface this review by stating, “I am an M. Knight Shamalan fan”. So, you might find that I’m a little bit biased. However, it often seems that a man has no harsh a critic as his greatest fan. One need only peruse the comments left by old-school Star Wars fans in regards to the newest additions to the series as proof of that statement. The trailers for Lady in the Water initially led me to believe that this movie was a horror film. Not so. This lady is a fairy tale. So, don’t purchase your ticket expecting to be scared out of your wits. By all means, do purchase that ticket, but go in willing to be lead along a path of whimsy and puzzlement placed in a time close to our own. It’s about time we learned to imagine again.

The entire movie takes place at an apartment complex. The opening sequence fills the audience in as to the background of the tale. Immediately afterward, we are introduced to the cast of important characters. Pay attention, if you can, because you’ll need these clues to figure out the puzzle. A mysterious lady emerges from the complex’s swimming pool and involves its caretaker in her quest to find a certain writer and then return to her aquatic homeworld. He continues, without question, to aid her in her mission. The tennents are soon drawn in and so is the audience, as we try to pick up the pieces. If Lady in the Water wasn’t based on a book, then I applaud the director’s imagination. If it is, then I applaud his adaptation. Either way, full points for originality.

Plot: 5 stars

There weren’t any characters that I didn’t enjoy, and there aren’t any actors in this movie that I can condemn. Following the habits of Alfred Hitchcock and Stephen King, Shamalan likes to appear in each of his films, if only as a cameo. My only criticism of the cast is the director’s portrayal of himself as the noble squire. Although he knows he is ill fated, he chooses to boldly strike forth as a martyr. It just seems a bit conceited to me. For comic relief, one of the tennants of the building happens to be a movie critic and I can’t help but imagine that Shamalan is striking back. Once again, each actor plays their role expertly and isn’t unbelieveable, even for a moment.

Acting: 4 stars

Lady in the Water isn’t a gun-blast extravaganza. Neither is it a kung-fu classic. However, it does have elements of suspense and pulse pounding. What exists in the way of action is played out timely and skillfully. It serves the purpose of pulling the audience into the drama. Anyone expecting an all out battle with the sinister beast will be disappointed.

Action: 3 stars

There is plenty of CGI in Lady. But, it isn’t glorified. The mood is enhanced well by the sets and lighting. Although there is no definate time frame expressed (the writer still uses a typewriter), there is the sense of a modern day relevence. What I’m saying is, it’s easy to imagine oneself as a tennant in this building. The setting is appropriate to draw in the viewer.

Visual: 3 stars

Dialogue is believeable and sometimes whitty, especially during the three-way conversations of the asian tennant, her mother, and the caretaker. Every line is fitting to its character. Even the film critic’s monologue to himself aids the absorbtion of the audience. Early on in the film, it’s curious that each of the character’s should be so ready to believe in our fairy tale. But, the dialogue eventually helps to illustrate the director’s awareness of the audience’s thoughts.

Dialogue: 4 stars

In summation, see it, see it, see it! It’s worth the price of admission for the adventure alone. This is one movie I’d love to see again and will anxiously await purchase on DVD.

Alternate viewing choice: The Village
  • IMDB site

  • Official site

  • Rotten Tomatoes review


  • ***Note: If you found this review via IMDB, please let us know by leaving a comment. Thanks!***

    Monday, July 24, 2006

    UnDead (2003)

    Two essentials of zombie fighting gear.
    Director: The Spierig Brothers
    Venue: DVD
    DVD Features: unavailable

    Althought I’ve long been a horror movie fan, I had, until recently, shied away from zombie flicks. However, movies like Night of the Living Dead and 28 Days Later have forced me to recognize that there are a handful of genuinely entertaining films that feature animated corpses. While digging through the “4 for 20” bin at the local movie store, I stumbled across UnDead. It was the endorsement at the top of the box that convinced me to give it a shot. It read, “The most inventive zombie film since Peter Jackson’s Brain Dead”, a quote by Tony Timpone of Fangoria Magazine. First, Peter Jackson has made a few great horror movies (yes, he worked before Lord of the Rings). Second, I figure that anyone working at Fangoria must know a thing or two about horror.

    UnDead takes place in a small town somewhere in Australia. It involves a small handful of characters, a dash of comedy, and a twist of alien encounter. I won’t bother breaking down the plot, as it’s basically the same as every other zombie film ever made. A band of unlikely cohorts find themselves surrounded by legions of the walking dead and have to fight their way out. I did enjoy the alien twist, the “down under” lingo and the ending.

    Plot: 3 ½ stars

    There weren’t any actors in UnDead that I recognized, but they all did a solid job (on the scale of horror movie acting). The two primary characters are a gun-toting fisherman, who seems a little nuts, and a newly crowned “catch of the day” queen down on her luck. They both kick ass at kicking zombie ass. They’re also both likeable in their strange and separate ways. In any zombie movie, there are two types of human characters. One the one hand, there are those who embrace their survival role with gusto. On the other, there are the helpless hysterics. Among the latter, UnDead features a law officer who agitated my nerves completely. I think he must have been an Australian inside joke, but does the fact that I hated the guy point to good acting or no?

    Acting: 3 stars

    There has to be a certain element of action in any zombie movie. After all, the best way to kill one is to remove its head. I have a sneaking suspeicion that The Spierig Brothers are fans of John Woo. The action in UnDead is practically an homage to Woo’s gunplay choreography. There are some inventive weapons in the movie as well. Zombies get killed via sawblade, canned air and “The Club”. Overall, the action is entertaining, comedic and well placed.

    Action: 4 stars

    Another vitally important aspect to reviewing a zombie movie is atmosphere and special effects. UnDead does have some CGI, but it isn’t overused or hokey. If UnDead had had a larger budget, I think it would have been tempting to go overboard. Most of the gore is done the old fashioned way and I almost always appreciate it when film-makers go that route in an age when it’s become easy to rely on computers. The atmosphere in this movie is appropriately dark and desolate.

    Visual: 4 stars

    There isn’t much to say about the dialogue in this film. “Braaaaains…” In a few scenes, a noticeable attempt is made at humor and “cool”, but that effort falls short of the mark. There weren’t any lines that really stuck with me and there weren’t any “laugh-out-loud” moments via dialoge.

    Dialogue: 2 stars

    Overall, I can say that UnDead is a solid, fun zombie film with a healthy helping of gore. I recommend viewing, definitely and possibly purchase.

    Alternate viewing choice: Shawn of the Dead
    IMDB site
    Official site: not found (Lions Gate Films)
    Rotten Tomatoes review

    ***Note: If you found this review via IMDB, please let us know by leaving a comment. Thanks!***

    Notice: A Few Changes

    I'd like readers to be aware of a few new things here. I've decided that the CGI/ cinemetography category is better named "visual effect" so as to encompass computer effects, set design, atmosphere, etc. Secondly, instead of giving my ratings as a list at the beginning of each review, I've decided to list the ratings for each category separately, after the corresponding paragraph. This way, readers will be forced to actually read the reviews. (hee hee hee)

    Please expect continuing changes as I get the hang of things around here. I will always post a notice when I decide to mix it up!

    Friday, July 14, 2006

    Superman Returns (2006)



    Director: Bryan Singer
    Venue: theater
    Starring: Bryan Singer, Kate Bosworth, Parker Posey
    Trailer

    Neko's Rating:
    Plot: 3 stars
    Acting: 3 stars
    Action: 3 stars
    CGI: 4 stars
    Dialogue: 3 stars

    Review:

    So they finally made another Superman movie, eh? There seems to be a rash of superhero movies being released lately. I’d be curious to know what Christopher Reeves thinks of the new guy. Naturally, the new film will be compared to it’s prequels by reviewers, audiences, and pop media. There will be no exception here.

    The movie opens with Superman’s return to Earth after a long quest to find the remains of his home planet, Krypton. While he was away, the rest of the world has been going about its business, especially Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth). She’s got a new man and a son in tow, as well as a Pulitzer Prize she earned for her article entitled, “Why the world doesn’t need Superman”. Uh oh, looks like someone is bitter. The plot of the film centers around two issues: the relationship between Lois and Superman (Bryan Singer) and Lex Luthor‘s new plan to drown a large portion of the U.S. So, what else is new?

    Now, let’s pick this sucker apart. Plot. Watching a Superman movie is much like watching an episode of Scooby Doo or Sailor Moon. The same thing basically happens in each one. I think I can excuse this movie’s lack of originality in light of the fact that it’s been so long since the previous film. New audiences need to be with the way the writers kept the continuity of the story line intact. Lex Luthor is out of prison and I love the explaination of why he was released. Sure, Superman brings the baddies in, but does he ever appear in court? Good point. I also enjoyed the fact that Lois’s new fella isn’t an unlikeable replacement. Otherwise, it would be easy to hate him and begrudge Lois for making poor choices. Lane also has a son and he seems to be the only one to notice the similarity between Clark Kent and the Man of Steel. I have one question though. The way I understand it, Kryptonite is part of Superman’s home planet. So, shouldn’t exposure to Kryptonite make him just like a normal guy? If that’s true, why does he always get his ass kicked when his powers are taken away? I mean, the guy is pretty buff to begin with. Shouldn’t he be able to fight like a really buff human could?

    Acting. My favorite casting choice is the new Lex Luthor. I’m not going to mention who the new actor is, but I never thought anyone could replace Gene Hackman as the arch nemesis. I was pleasantly surprised! The part is played with just as much villany, but not as much goofy. In fact, the new Luthor seems to be a lot better at planning than before. His sidekick is played by Parker Posey. I’m not her biggest fan. Think “Blade Trinity” without the fangs (literally and figuratively). Bryan Singer does, in fact, make a good Superman/Kent. He’s got the strong jaw, trademark curl, and sparkling smile required for the job. Oh, and he doesn’t look bad in tights either. I think Singer does a good job and I hope he doesn’t get too much flack for trying to fill Reeve’s costume. How about Lois Lane? No, I can’t say that I’m happy with Kate Bosworth as a replacement. Visually, I think she’s too manly and she comes off as a complete bitch during the entire film. Margot Kidder needn’t loose sleep over her status as the best Lois ever.

    Action. For the most part, the action flows nicely in Superman Returns. Aside from the first half hour or so, there aren’t any long periods of boredom. I don’t have any complaints about the camera angles or the choreography. There weren’t any scenes that had me at the edge of my seat either.

    CGI. Obviously, a superhero movie in this day and age is going to be chock full of special effects. Although they weren’t particularly astounding, I think they were relatively seamless and believeable. My favorite CGI scene is when Lois and family are rescued from the sinking ship. I think it was more the style in which it’s done, rather than the graphics particularly, but it was cool nonetheless.

    Dialogue. The dialogue, like the action, was well done, but not fantastic. I don’t remember any moment where I laughed out loud at any of the comedy. I also can’t recall any lines that would make a good tattoo. However, I don’t think I moaned in disgust either. So-so.

    In summary, I definitely recommend going to see Superman Returns. It’s fun and worth what I paid for admission to see it on the big screen. Fans of the old movies won’t be disappointed. However, if you’re unfamiliar with the Superman saga, you might want to bone up with some rentals first.

    Alternate viewing choice: Spiderman 2
    Official Site
    IMDB Site
    Rotten Tomatoes review

    ***Note: If you found this review via IMDB, please let us know by leaving a comment. Thanks!***

    Thursday, July 13, 2006

    About Neko Noir

    Neko was born in the Midwestern United States. She spent many years in Austin, Texas, where she attended college before living for a brief period in San Diego, California. Although she has no formal education in cinema, or personal ties to the business, she has great passion for film and enjoys writing and sharing her opinion. She spends most of her time curled up with her three cats in front of the DVD player.

    Tired of reading clinical reviews of Hollywood Blockbusters she’d never want to see, Neko decided to start Gummi Popcorn. Her goal is to share her love of movies with a casual voice and a candid personality. Instead of dry, technical analysis, her reviews offer the type of advice one might hear from a friend. Neko also ties her love of art and web design into Gummi Popcorn and has designed the entire site personally. (Note: the current layout is a Blogger template, and not created by Neko.)

    About Gummi Popcorn

    Gummi Popcorn began in July of 2006 under the title Neko Goes To The Movies. In just the first year of publication, the website had over 50 reviews posted. While the majority of reviews cover horror and independent films, the site’s focus is limited only by the length of the feature, rather than the genre. Television programs, music videos and other media on DVD are not reviewed here.

    Great care is taken to ensure the accuracy of information on the site, as well as maintaining the absence of “spoilers”. At the head of each review, the director’s name, the format in which the movie was viewed, and the names of its stars can be found. One rating for the overall opinion of the movie and one rating for the degree of sexiness found on screen (called the “hottie” rating) conclude each review. Each of these ratings is scored on a scale of 0-5, with 5 being the best possible score. Following the review itself, an alternate movie recommendation, the movie’s official website (whenever possible), the Internet Movie Data Base’s site for the movie, and a “second opinion” review can be located.

    The purpose of Gummi Popcorn is to share the author’s opinions and to entertain the internet audience. Comments are always welcome and will be reviewed prior to posting. The occasional poll or side note will also appear from time to time, as well as upcoming changes to the site itself. The hope is for this website to become a valuable resource for people who love movies and film newbies alike.

    Introduction

    This site is currently under construction. Please visit again soon, as we will be posting reviews shortly.